Twas the Night regarding the Living Dead: Zombie Apocalypse Is a Good Bet

Twas the Night regarding the Living Dead: Zombie Apocalypse Is a Good Bet

Day might the Zombie Apocalypse arrive on Xmas? You’ll bet on it! (Image: zombieapocalypse.com)

Every year punters place bets on whether or not they are going to get up up to a snowy blanket across their streets on Christmas morning. It’s the old romantic in each of us that longs for this backdrop that is scenic a joyous day, surrounded by our loved ones and overeating with all the Christmas trimmings, cannibalizing and distributing our infectious zombie disease. Wait. What?

Betting on Zombies

While many are gambling for a white Christmas time, UK bookmaking giant Ladbrokes is offering chances of 2000/1 on this Christmas being the beginning of the Zombie Apocalypse. That is clearly a good, festive idea to possess, and beats the odds they offer for football team Crystal Palace winning the Premier League in 2010 at 5000/1. Mention harmful gambling.

‘we are quite confident that the odds of a Zombie Apocalypse at 2000/1 are correct, and although the public should exert caution over the Christmas period, they ought not to be unduly concerned about the undead rising up to attack and consume the living,’ announced Alex Donohue, a spokesman for the Ladbrokes bookmaker.

Odds for a white xmas currently stand at 5/1, which is really a much better chance compared to those offered on the https://real-money-casino.club/winner-online-casino/ doomsday coming associated with undead, and you’re much more likely in order to claim your winnings after a bit of snow as opposed to needing to fight your way through the zombie hordes to collect your prize. If you got that bet right, that’s for sure although you would be pretty smug with yourself.

While the chance to bet on the Zombie Apocalypse is more than probably a nice bit of publicity for Ladbrokes, Sean web Page zombie specialist and founder associated with Ministry of Zombies has urged the public to organize for the worst.

‘The public is always interested in the odds of the white Christmas, but they should really be more concerned by the increasing likelihood of a Zombie Apocalypse,’ stated Page, suggesting, maybe, that he’s nipping during the whiskey having a bit alacrity that is too much.

‘The many time that is likely an outbreak is throughout the busy holiday season as people save money time in large groups, which makes it easier for the zombie virus to distribute, triggering the Apocalypse,’ Page added. Apparently, he’s seen it happen prior to.

Wagers That Are Dead On

2000/1 seems a bit too low for the likelihood of a zombie epidemic really, but this is simply not the time that is first has offered the chance to place wagers on the Apocalypse, because they also offered equivalent odds in the outbreak of a undead siege on December 21st 2012, due to all of the hype around the end of the Mayan calendar to which doomsday ‘enthusiasts’ were clinging hopefully in expectation of their impending doom.

Strangely enough, Ladbrokes are also offering much more likely chances of 500/1 regarding the possibility of Prince Harry getting hitched to Miley Cyrus, however the smart profit this situation would probably be regarding the zombies, despite the fact you know, end of the world and all that that you would be unlikely to recoup any wager due to the. So less ‘nothing was stirring’ and more ‘watch out for the bloodthirsty, flesh-eating undead outside of the door.’

MGM Clears Hurdles in Massachusetts; Gaming Commission Still Must Okay

MGM Resorts is almost through the gauntlet that is regulatory Massachusetts for their Springfield casino project (Image: Artist’s rendering of casino)

Just once you thought no one would ever be good enough for Massachusetts’ insanely fastidious gaming commission, the MGM actually earned their approbation this week. The commission’s investigative supply which could have its TV that is own series ‘MGC P.I.’ recommended that MGM Resorts be found suitable to move forward with their Springfield casino project, with the caveat that MGM executives have the ability to talk their way away from a few lingering issues associated with commission, concerns that came to light once the commission conducted its regulatory background check regarding the casino company.

Cleared for Lose

Whenever we state ‘lengthy’, we aren’t whistling Dixie; the Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement spent days gone by 10 months looking through every speck of dust that anyone connected with MGM ever came across, and amazingly noted that they discovered nothing that would automatically disqualify the team from establishing up house within the pristine state of Massachusetts.

But it is not really a done deal yet; the five Massachusetts Gaming Commissioners still get to have the word that is last whether or not MGM are going to be able to conduct business within their neck of this woods. But if they give their papal blessing to the company, MGM will then have the ability to submit their last application as the best western Massachusetts casino permit that are provided; and since they’re the actual only real remaining applicant, that would seem to become a pretty complete deal.

The sole tiny ding that the Bureau could dig up after nearly a year of searching all documented in a 500-page report on the subject was MGM’s way of dealing former executive board member Terry Christensen, who in 2008 was convicted on charges concerning the wiretapping of business mogul Kirk Kerkorian’s ex-wife when Kerkorian had been included in a child support fight that is gruesome.

‘Despite their indictment, resignation from the Board and ultimate conviction, Christensen was allowed to engage, on a repeated and prolonged basis, in certain delicate and non-public corporate issues of MGM Resorts … including his attendance at Board meetings,’ scolded the report.

In this dance of mea culpa, MGM CEO James Murren took the position of penitent profligate because of the Commission only at that week’s hearing, noting that it turned out an error for the organization to allow boy that is bad to continue in every capability with the company.

‘we exercised poor judgment,’ said Murren, who was simply the outfit’s CFO when all this transpired. ‘It was a bad concept from the very beginning. None of us should have had any contact with (Christensen).’

Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

More Executive Contrition

Murren wasn’t alone to throw himself regarding the mercy for the court, as current MGM board member (and mind of its review committee) Roland Hernandez made a point to inform commissioners that protocols are now set up in the company to guarantee here will likely to be no repeats of the poor process that is decision-making.

All which was then left for the commish to deal with had been a few concerns they had about some MGM dealings in Macau; mostly, these centered around a former partnership with Chinese business mogul (and daughter of casino mega-mogul Stanley Ho) Pansy Ho. Ho had been deemed unsuitable as somebody during a 2010 New Jersey hearing that is regulatory the matter, and also as such, MGM had to unload a 50 percent stake in an Atlantic City casino there, simply to keep their nose clean. The allegations were that Ho’s father Stanley had had transactions with some gangs that are chinese a definite ‘no-no’ in today’s regulatory video gaming universe.

Hernandez had to the Massachusetts commissioners that Ms. Ho had been involved with MGM completely separate from her father, and that she was primarily involved in non-gaming business tasks regarding their MGM Macau property. Hernandez also noted that other, less finicky, states had been fine with the Ho interaction; particularly, Nevada and Maryland, both of which had no problem along with it. He also noted that New Jersey has now softened their own stance, and may allow MGM back to the fold in Atlantic City.

The panel should rule later on this week; the commission’s chair Stephen Crosby won’t state which way the wind is blowing, but noted he appreciated the MGM execs’ openness in working with these issues.

But even being truly the only applicant and even in the event cleared by the commission this it’s still not a 100 percent slam-dunk for MGM Resorts week.

‘One applicant or 10, we are going to hold their feet to the fire to ensure we have a application that is really good’ Crosby advised reporters throughout a hearing break.

Setback for PokerStars as brand New Jersey Bars Licensing for 2 Years

PokerStars got a smack from nj regulators this when they put them in licensing limbo for the next two years week

If there is one name that has dominated the American online poker market over the last decade, it offers to be PokerStars. However if you’re living in New Jersey, you should not expect to be playing for a site operated by the poker giant any time quickly.

Two Years in Limbo

The nj-new Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement determined this week to suspend the overview of PokerStars’ application for an on-line gambling permit for couple of years, effectively locking the business from the state’s on-line poker marketplace for that time period.

‘The Division of Gaming Enforcement has determined that the use of Rational Services Limited (PokerStars) casino solution industry licensure (CSIE) will likely be in a status that is suspended a period of two years,’ the Division said in a declaration.

However, the door just isn’t totally closed on PokerStars.

‘The Division, within that duration, may consider a request for relief to reactivate the application if significantly changed circumstances are demonstrated, at which time the Division’s investigation of PokerStars and its own entities that are affiliated associated individuals will be resumed to evaluate suitability.’

Bad Company, Bad Actor

Although PokerStars has long settled the federal government to its case and admitted no wrongdoing as a part of that settlement New Jersey regulators still have some issues with the company. Chief the type of appears to be founder Isai Scheinberg to their association, who has been under federal indictment since Black Friday. Scheinberg isn’t U.S. citizen, and have not come to your U.S. to face those charges, to no body’s shock.

While this is a loss that is huge PokerStars, it also marks a huge win because of its competitors in the nj-new Jersey market. As we reported recently, the site run by PartyPoker jointly with the Borgata Casino currently features a 50 percent share of the state’s poker marketplace, utilizing the Caesars/888 World Series of Poker site not far behind. Those two companies could have been overshadowed easily by the PokerStars site which will were operated along with Resorts Casino and had been hoping that their mind start would give them an edge that will allow them to keep competitive. Now, they’ll have at least two years to produce brand name loyalty, something that PokerStars may have a time that is difficult, if and when these are typically finally licensed for brand New Jersey’s online market.

PokerStars was predictably not thrilled by the news, though they noted that the state’s decision could improvement in the long term.

‘Our company is disappointed that the N.J. Division of Gaming Enforcement has suspended the review of our application at this right time,’ said PokerStars spokesman Eric Hollreiser in a statement. ‘We note that the DGE will resume the summary of our application if our circumstances change. We will remain in open dialogue with the DGE and will update them on alterations in our situation while they occur.’

This wasn’t initial disappointing result for PokerStars in nj-new jersey. Formerly, the company had tried to shop for the Atlantic Club Casino, only to have that deal fall apart over concerns about whether regulators would approve the purchase. That choice was also expensive, as PokerStars lost about $11 million that they had spent on casino expenses a total that was supposed to be used towards the eventual $15 million purchase price.