European Commission Nixes Across-the-Board Member Country Online Gambling Synchronicity, Mirroring States’ Rights Issues

Europea<span id="more-22728"></span>n Commission Nixes Across-the-Board Member Country Online Gambling Synchronicity, Mirroring States’ Rights Issues

The European Commission’s Harrie Temmink, who told ICE last week that EU-wide online gambling legislation would not occur in his lifetime ‘or the next.’

The European Commission (EC) has abandoned the idea of a pan-European framework that is regulatory online gambling, accepting that individual member states mainly oppose synchronizing their Internet gaming regulations. The move interestingly mirrors similar problems in the US, where states’ rights vs. federal dictates have become an ongoing battle in the iGaming wars.

Talking at last week’s International Casino Exhibition in London (ICE), Harrie Temmink told the industry emphatically that the EC was not focusing on sector-specific legislation in gambling.

‘The Commission is not proposing it and will not propose it,’ he said. ‘Not in my life time or the next.’

Temmink leads the gambling team unit and chairs the EC’s Expert Group on Gambling Services.

This is often a far cry from the EC’s previous stance. In 2011, Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier proposed A eu-wide framework devoted to protecting consumers and citizens, preventing fraudulence, and maintaining the integrity of sports.

EU Action Plan

Barnier’s view at that time was that ‘the prevailing regulatory, societal and technical [online gambling] issues in the EU’ could never be ‘tackled adequately by member states individually.’

‘This is very true given the dimension that is cross-border of gambling,’ he stated in 2012, when it had been announced that the EC would prepare an ‘action plan’ to simplify the regulation of the sector and encourage cooperation between member states.

The EC frowned on the regulatory actions which had been used France, Italy, and Spain, which saw those markets ring-fenced and operators taxed at a rate that is high in apparent conflict with EU ideals of free movement of services between member states.

Barnier’s plan wasn’t proposing just one licensing that is EU, but alternatively had the target of ensuring that member states adopted its vision for a more liberal regulatory landscape across Europe. Member states that refused to play ball would then be sanctioned, in Barnier’s vision.

But Barnier left the post in 2014, and their successor, Günther Oettinger, seems less zealous about pushing the cause and more resigned to making regulation to individual jurisdictions.

More Fragmented than Ever

As Temmink explained, ‘I can assure you that if we proposed legislation on gambling, in the first meeting with the Council, we would have 26 out of 28 member states that would be fiercely opposed to the proposal.

‘It would be suicide,’ he added.

Since Barnier outlined his plan in 2012, a wave of new regulation has spread across Europe, and numerous new licensing regimes have sprung up, through the UK to Portugal. Europe has become also less coordinated in the front that is iGaming as well as the fragmented regulatory landscape proves a greater challenge to operators than ever.

‘Operators need to have a license for the country that is specific that they provide games, without being able to count on the recognition of licenses between one European country and another,’ said Temmink. ‘For their part is for the Member States to make certain a system that is non-discriminatory of permits.’

Nevada Voters Courted by Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, Democratic Caucus Are Going To Be Key

Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are focused on reaching as numerous Nevada voters as you possibly can before the Silver State caucuses on Feb. 23rd in what is shaping up to be a make-or-break point into the campaign that is democratic. (Image: Jim Young/Reuters)

Nevada voters are the focal point for both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders’ campaigns appropriate now, as the two Democratic presidential nominees make an effort to persuade as many last-minute voters to vote for them before this week’s February caucus that is 23rd.

The Silver State had long been thought to be her roadblock to stop any Bernie Sanders momentum after Clinton’s narrow victory in Iowa, followed by a hefty defeat in New Hampshire. She once held a nearly 50-point lead over her challengers, but Sanders’ grassroots movement has severely tightened the race, with numerous analysts now believing Nevada is up for grabs.

Clinton and Sanders each invested the week-end making stops around the state. Sanders campaigned in Reno on Saturday, then Las Vegas on Sunday, while their opponent met with voters in many areas across the gaming mecca throughout the weekend.

The two Democrats concluded the weekend on Sunday during the Victory Missionary Baptist Church in Las Vegas, a congregation largely made up of African-Americans.

‘we send a profound message to the entire country, and that message is that the people of this country will no longer accept establishment politics,’ Sanders said during his brief remarks if we can win here in Nevada.

Clinton responded to Sanders with a relative line as vague as Bernie’s plan of just how he will fund his utopian vision.

‘I am not a single issue candidate,’ Clinton said. ‘ Because whenever we were going to achieve everything about banking institutions and cash and politics, would that end racism?’

Say what now?

Nevada Key State in Runoff

Whenever Sanders officially announced their decision to run for the presidency in May, the so-called ‘Clinton machine’ was already likely to work in Nevada. Volunteers had been making hundreds of daily calls, going door-to-door, and obtaining endorsements from key state and local leaders.

The Vermont senator didn’t have much of a possibility, at least according to governmental pundits.

Fast-forward nine months, and Clinton just canceled an occasion in Florida this week to stay the course in Nevada and shake every hand, ascend each stage, and grasp every microphone she can before Nevadans head to caucus on Saturday.

Nevada has a long history of being a swing state within the general presidential election, and its constituents have a nearly perfect record of voting for the winner that is eventual. Since 1912, Nevada has correctly chosen the next president, except for in 1976, when Nevada visited Gerald Ford over Jimmy Carter.

A win in Nevada for Clinton will be expected, while a win for Sanders pull off just what would perhaps end up being the biggest political upset in modern history.

Neck-in-Neck towards the Finish

Nevada is home to the gambling epicenter of the United States, therefore possibly it is appropriate that there surely is little evidence that is statistical run on in determining which candidate will win on Saturday.

The reality is that gambling on Clinton or Sanders is equivalent to gambling on red or black. Probably the most poll that is recent TargetPoint, initial political information on the battle since late December, has Clinton and Sanders tied 45-45.

Scalia Death Further Stirs the Pot

Incorporating to your intensity of it all, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia passed away on Saturday in Texas of apparent causes that are natural the age of 79. Appointed to the bench by President Reagan in 1986, the consistently conservative judge’s death leaves a vacancy on the greatest court that is already causing more political divide between Republicans and Democrats.

A number of names have been tossed around, including Nevada that is current Governor Sandoval (R). A welcomed compromise to both conservative and liberal congressional leaders though Sandoval’s GOP label might make him seem unlikely for an Obama endorsement, his pro-choice and pro-immigration views could make the first Silver State governor of Hispanic heritage.

Nevada Gaming Regulator Michonne Ascuaga Resigns Over Alleged Sparks Nugget Improprieties

Michonne Ascuaga, who may have resigned from the Nevada Gaming Commission in the wake of the news that a property she formerly managed with her household, the Sparks Nugget in northern Nevada, is being examined for lax anti-money laundering controls. (Image: ktvn.com)

Michonne Ascuaga has resigned from her post on the Nevada Gaming Commission, following the revelation of alleged financial improprieties at the Sparks Nugget, the casino in northern Nevada that she handled for 16 years.

The Nugget has been investigated by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) over allegations that it did not comply with financial regulations during Ascuaga’s tenure, and neglected to ascertain an effective anti-money laundering program.

The investigation found light in a court filing week that is last as element of a longstanding contractual lawsuit brought by the Ascuaga family up against the casino’s new owners, Wolfhound Holdings, the private investment team that bought the home in 2013.

Sandoval Unaware of Investigation

A spokeswoman for Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval said that Sandoval had been unaware of this research whenever he appointed Ascuaga to the Gaming Commission panel last April.

‘Michonne Ascuaga has served the Nevada Gaming Commission well,’ penned Brian Sandoval in accepting the resignation. ‘I admire her and wish to recognize her family’s long history as leaders in the gaming industry.

‘I appreciate he added that she has put the credibility and reputation of the Gaming Commission first. ‘Michonne is a consummate professional and will continue to be a frontrunner in our community.’

Ascuaga has claimed within an official statement that she ‘did not purposely hold back information from the governor.’

‘The Sparks Nugget ended up being informed in November 2013 by the Department of Treasury that the Department was investigating she added whether it was appropriate to impose civil penalties for possible violations of anti-money laundering regulations. ‘The matter arose from an audit-type examination conducted by the IRS during the casino in 2010. It was all disclosed immediately towards the buyer.’

Ascuaga Lawsuit

Its alleged that the Nugget has been investigated for laxity in its reporting and record-keeping requirements. By legislation, all businesses must file a Currency Transaction Report on all transactions over $10,000, and report any suspicious activity to FinCEN, as an easy https://casinopokies777.com/casino-888/ method of guarding against money-laundering.

Ascuaga is the daughter of John L. Ascuaga, the son of the Basque shepherd who owned the Nugget for over 50 years before its sale to Wolfhound. The Ascuaga household believes it is still owed $500,000 beneath the purchase and sale agreement of the Nugget.

Ascuaga said she was resigning ‘out of deep respect for the Nevada Gaming Commission also to not allow myself to become an unnecessary distraction from the crucial regulatory oversight work it does.’